2ebe10e59d6e4ee9a43a3742f9098397544708626aa14130b36f2775ad177343645b733dca764668bb358f05a9c141126f8dbccfa82543818b5387aa75ca551f77f19c6377bd406c8f8b1ad57cd98935a7e3bdfd5fc54818aaf629dd069dacaed3adcaaef2074398b050dd23e206a2f5ecd65950e2dc484aa2fb9691becb7676fafc5decb65a483593a7355cba09ee67fc6d9302679e4998862d72989a6d5da5
person
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
agent
Eerste hulp bij FAIR dataD5.1 Implementing metrics for automated FAIR digital objects assessment in a disciplinary contextRecognising and implementing FAIR throughout the organisationEnsuring Trustworthy Curation: ACME-FAIR Issue #7FAIRsFAIR D4.3 Report on the certification support and guidance for repositories and reviewersGuidebook - Depositing Restricted Access In The DANS Data StationsFAIRsFAIR D4.5 Report on FAIR Data Assessment Toolset and Badging SchemeD4.6 Report on a maturity model towards FAIR data in FAIR repositoriesFAIR-IMPACT Introduction on exposing repository trustworthiness status and FAIR data assessments outcomesM5.4 Practical tests for automated FAIR digital object assessment in disciplinary contextEOSC Policy Brief for FAIR-IMPACTHow repositories can increase their FAIR shareD5.2 - Metrics for automated FAIR software assessment in a disciplinary contextPost-workshop report - "Guidelines on transparent exposure of repository information: informing decisions of trustworthiness"M5.5 - Initial repository registry support for discovery of repositories, policies, and interfacesCultureel erfgoed in kaart gebrachtTowards a European network of FAIR-enabling Trustworthy Digital Repositories (TDRs)FAIR-enabling and Trustworthy Qualities of Data ArchivesFAIR-IMPACT project response to "FAIR Assessment Tools: Towards an "Apples to Apples" Comparisons"CoreTrustSeal: het keurmerk voor betrouwbare archievenData Access Protocol TemplateFAIR-enabling Data Policy ChecklistD4.7 Tools for finding and selecting certified repositories for researchers and other stakeholdersM5.1 - Reference collection of test data setsDigital badge for responsible conduct of researchM5.2 - Guidelines for repositories and registries on exposing repository trustworthiness status and FAIR data assessments outcomesFAIR-IMPACT project response to "Community-driven governance of FAIRness assessment: an open issue, an open discussion"FAIR-Aware Additional guidance to the Science Europe DMP assessment rubricTransparency of Trust: guidelines for the discovery of trustworthiness status for digital repositoriesConnecting Data Stewardship to Research ProjectsMaking Qualitative Data ReusableMaking your repository more trustworthy and FAIR-enabling a support programmeSamenwerken met en aan data: DIGILAB en FAIRD4.4 Coordination Plan for a sustainable network of FAIR-enabling Trustworthy Digital RepositoriesIntroduction to the guidelines for repositories and registries on exposing repository trustworthiness status and FAIR data assessments outcomesFAIRsFAIR Structured Policy Description TemplateEuropean Research Data Landscape Study Report (deliverables 3.2, 4.2, 5.2)Reuse of qualitative research dataUniting researchers and repositories to improve data FAIRnessResearch Data Landscape infographic (European Research Data Landscape study)
author
education
type
label
M.L. Verburg
sameAs
firstName
lastName
name
employeeId
orcid
0000-0001-9408-3190
orcid
workforce_id
staffOrganisationAssociations
visibility
Public - No restriction
@en
Publiek - Geen beperking
@nl
relatedLink
title
MSc
@nl