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
agent
D5.1 Implementing metrics for automated FAIR digital objects assessment in a disciplinary contextMetadata Quality ImprovementFAIRsFAIR D4.3 Report on the certification support and guidance for repositories and reviewersFAIRsFAIR D4.5 Report on FAIR Data Assessment Toolset and Badging SchemeD4.6 Report on a maturity model towards FAIR data in FAIR repositoriesM4.2 Draft Maturity Model Based on Extensions and-or Additions to CoreTrustSeal RequirementsFAIRsFAIR M4.3 CoreTrustSeal+FAIRenabling, Capability and MaturityFAIR-IMPACT Introduction on exposing repository trustworthiness status and FAIR data assessments outcomesD5.8 Pan-European Uptake Final ReportD2.1 Targeted landscape analysis reportPost-workshop report - "Guidelines on transparent exposure of repository information: informing decisions of trustworthiness"M5.5 - Initial repository registry support for discovery of repositories, policies, and interfacesFAIRsFAIR Data Object Assessment MetricsSSHOC D8.2 Certification plan for SSHOC repositoriesCoreTrustSeal plus FAIR OverviewM4.9 Report on Fair Data Assessment Mechanisms to Develop Pragmatic Concepts for Fairness Evaluation at the Dataset LevelCapability Maturity & Community Engagement Design StatementM5.2 - Guidelines for repositories and registries on exposing repository trustworthiness status and FAIR data assessments outcomesFrom Conceptualization to Implementation: FAIR Assessment of Research Data ObjectsTransparency of Trust: guidelines for the discovery of trustworthiness status for digital repositoriesD4.4 Coordination Plan for a sustainable network of FAIR-enabling Trustworthy Digital RepositoriesPolicy and Evidence Planning for Data Services: Business Information ManagementIntroduction to the guidelines for repositories and registries on exposing repository trustworthiness status and FAIR data assessments outcomesD5.4 FAIRSFAIR Communication, Marketing Engagement Plan (Final Version)DSA–WDS Partnership: Streamlining the landscape of data repository certificationThe TRUST Principles for digital repositoriesCoreTrustSeal Trustworthy Data Repositories Requirements 2020–2022CoreTrustSeal Trustworthy Data Repositories Requirements: Extended Guidance 2020–2022Technical and Security Aspects of the CoreTrustSeal ApplicationCoreTrustSeal Trustworthy Data Repositories Requirements: Glossary 2020–2022
author
nationality
type
label
Hervé L'Hours